Back to Document 12
Up to Document List
Ahead to Document 14

Document 13 –

Letter from W.F. Thornton to William Gooding Concerning
a Suspension of Operations
 

December 20, 1839
 


Document 13
Click for larger image

  

Transcription

                               Springfield Decr. 20th 1839

William Gooding Esqr

              Principal Engr &c
                                   Sir,
                                       The accompanying Re=
solution of the Ho: of Reps., calling for the probable
amount of damages that would result from a
suspension of operations on the Canal, must be
answered as early as accurate information can
be collected. You will therefore instruct the
Resident and assistant Engineers to ascertain
immediately the value of investments made by the
Contractors; and you will please give yourown
opinion, at large, together with all facts touching
the enquiry.

                         Very Respectfully
                                   yr obt. svt
                                        W.F. Thornton
                                             Prest. Can Com


Explanation

Despite the Panic of 1837 and subsequent national and international economic depression, work on the canal continued unabated through 1839 and beyond. The entire line was in progress in 1838 with the only exceptions being twenty-two miles between Dresden and Marseilles and a mile stretch through the Saganaskee Swamp. By the end of 1839 nearly three million dollars had been expended for canal purposes. Most of this money had been raised on credit. Receipts from canal land sales had brought less than a half million dollars. Negotiated loans totaled nearly two million and canal scrip issued in 1839 amounted to another $616,870.70.

Toward the end of 1839 the General Assembly was experiencing some unease over the financial condition of the canal project. The state, with some aid from the federal government, had invested nearly three million dollars in an unfinished hole in the ground. Only a finished canal capable of generating tolls afforded the opportunity to recoup that expenditure. But a finished canal was going to require an even greater investment.

An act passed by the General Assembly in 1837 provided for moving the state capitol from Vandalia to Springfield. Temporary quarters were occupied there in mid-1839. An elaborate new Capitol Building was opened in late 1840.


Points To Consider

What was the General Assembly’s House of Representatives trying to determine?

Why was the House seeking this determination?

What would "a suspension of operations on the Canal" have done to the price of canal lands? Why?

Why was W.F. Thornton, president of the board of canal commissioners, in Springfield on December 20, 1839?


Back to Document 12
Up to Document List
Ahead to Document 14

Back to Illinois and Michigan Canal Introduction page
Back to Illinois State Archives home page